Clam AV / Perl Modules
Dana Schuett
dana at troubleschuett.com
Thu Jul 30 14:52:31 UTC 2015
I noticed in the newest version of MailScanner (4.85.2-2) that they
recommend that you let the install script install Clam AV. I have always
installed clamd manually. I guess my question is, when letting the
script install clam, why does it use calmscan instead of clamd? Clamscan
causes a considerably high CPU load if you have any kind of mail volume.
Wouldn't it make much more sense to use clamd instead? I know clamd has
a significantly less CPU load. Any insight on this would be much
appreciated.
Also, I noticed that the install script tries to install perl modules
via Yum using the following format: Mail::ClamAV. In Yum, perl modules
use this format perl-Mail-ClamAV, so of course they all fail. I can't
believe this wasn't noticed by the devs.
- Dana
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20150730/6476dde7/attachment.html>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list