Disappearing email - could be OT

Alex Neuman alex at vidadigital.com.pa
Mon Feb 11 19:36:23 GMT 2013


Could be a .procmailrc issue. Does it happen to *all* e-mails, regardless
of recipient?

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Steve Campbell <campbell at cnpapers.com>wrote:

> I'm seeing a problem from a couple of my servers. I have a primary
> server for one of our domains, but I see emails coming through a
> secondary server for this domain. The email that gets sent through the
> secondary is relayed to the primary just fine.
>
> The problem is that the primary accepts the email and then disappears. I
> see a line in my sendmail logs like the following:
>
> On the secondary:
> sendmail[17339]: r1BGGT8J017339: from=<xxxxxx at yyyyy.
> com>, size=0, class=0, nrcpts=1, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA,
> relay=173-219-91-250.s
> ta.suddenlink.net [173.219.91.250] (may be forged)
>
> On the primary (relayed from the secondary above):
> sendmail[31249]: r1BGGZCZ031249: from=<debbie at kcprc.com>, size=0,
> class=0, nrcpts=1, proto=SMTP, daemon=MTA,
> relay=mailserver1.cnpapers.net [10.0.0.103]
>
> The logs above are for the same message. This is the only entries I see
> for this email in both logs. The email isn't delivered, logged through
> Mailscanner, and doesn't exist in the mqueue or mqueue.in directory.
>
> Has anyone seen this type of problem before? How did it get solved? Any
> reason to believe there's a problem in  the processing database and how
> do I discover this?
>
> thanks
>
> steve campbell
>
> Thanks for any
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>



-- 

--

Alex Neuman van der Hans
Reliant Technologies / Vida Digital
http://vidadigital.com.pa/

+507-6781-9505
+507-832-6725
+1-440-253-9789 (USA)

Follow @AlexNeuman on Twitter
http://facebook.com/vidadigital


-- So-called "legal disclaimers" are not legally binding, so don't bother.
A cute graphic saying "save the planet, don't print this" can potentially
create more CO2, not less, so don't bother either.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20130211/c499e323/attachment.html 


More information about the MailScanner mailing list