watermark and spam

[Julian Field]

On 10/05/2010 05:13, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 01:25 +0200, Mikael Syska wrote:
>>
>> Does the average user even check that mail could be miss tagged, our 
>> average users don't.
>>
>
> We have many that do, mostly corporate clients that inquire about it, 
> but if it happens to corporate clients enough to concern them, the 
> affect must be global and those home users must be  bothered as well.
> I modified our internal blurb to advise people on it long time ago, 
> but thats not fixing the root cause, its only working around it, 
> something im not fond of in any situation. 
So how would you like it to work and how does that differ from what it 
does now? And in *exactly* what circumstances do you want the change?

Jules

-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
Follow me at twitter.com/JulesFM and twitter.com/MailScanner


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.