watermark and spam

[Jason Ede]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-
> bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Julian Field
> Sent: 10 May 2010 08:52
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: watermark and spam
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/05/2010 05:13, Noel Butler wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 01:25 +0200, Mikael Syska wrote:
> >>
> >> Does the average user even check that mail could be miss tagged, our
> >> average users don't.
> >>
> >
> > We have many that do, mostly corporate clients that inquire about it,
> > but if it happens to corporate clients enough to concern them, the
> > affect must be global and those home users must be  bothered as well.
> > I modified our internal blurb to advise people on it long time ago,
> > but thats not fixing the root cause, its only working around it,
> > something im not fond of in any situation.
> So how would you like it to work and how does that differ from what it
> does now? And in *exactly* what circumstances do you want the change?
> 
> Jules

Would it be possible for the action on failing the watermark check be to add a header to the email (maybe even customisable header) instead of other actions and then we can just put a SA rule in with a detailed description that will go into the main spam report?

Jason