smf-sav & CentOS5

[Marc Lucke]

Only stupid question is one that isn't asked!  Actually the remote 
system is EIMS!  :)  Yeah - I checked all that out.


Glenn Steen wrote:
> Silly question... You are sure Exchange is rejecting unknown recipients?
> Else... Postfix is grand... Then again, I would be saying that, wouldn't i;-)
>
> 2010/1/15, Marc Lucke <marc at marcsnet.com>:
>   
>> I'll either try to work out what is wrong with smf-save on my 2x CentOS
>> 5.4 boxes or I'll looking into Postfix :)  The smf-sav list is looking a
>> little sad but my question wasn't only about if people here had it
>> running or not, but also if anyone was running another solution other
>> than milter-ahead which I don't want to pay for or smf-sav which I'm
>> having some sort of problem with.
>>
>> I did see the exchange script stuff but I won't implement that.
>>
>> Postfix looks like the best solution to me!
>>
>> Thanks list, for your input and advice! :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20100116/70d3c32d/attachment.html