OT: Which virus scanners to use

[Julian Field]

On 12/01/2010 07:58, Steve Freegard wrote:
> On 12/01/10 05:57, ram wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> We have been running f-prot (commercial ) and clamavmodule on our
>> servers but both of them are performance intensive
>> Also clam signatures are prone to errors in some cases.
>>
>> Is there a good lighter alternative (commercial ok) that Mailscanner
>> users may be using.
>
> IMO - you've already got the best two.
>
> Just convert to clamd instead of clamavmodule and fpscand (can't 
> remember if MailScanner supports this or not though).
Yes it does, both versions (v4 and v6).

Jules

-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
Follow me at twitter.com/JulesFM and twitter.com/MailScanner


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.