OT: Which virus scanners to use
Steve Freegard
steve.freegard at fsl.com
Tue Jan 12 07:58:24 GMT 2010
On 12/01/10 05:57, ram wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have been running f-prot (commercial ) and clamavmodule on our
> servers but both of them are performance intensive
> Also clam signatures are prone to errors in some cases.
>
> Is there a good lighter alternative (commercial ok) that Mailscanner
> users may be using.
IMO - you've already got the best two.
Just convert to clamd instead of clamavmodule and fpscand (can't
remember if MailScanner supports this or not though).
Cheers,
Steve.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list