OT: Which virus scanners to use
steve.freegard at fsl.com
Tue Jan 12 07:58:24 GMT 2010
On 12/01/10 05:57, ram wrote:
> We have been running f-prot (commercial ) and clamavmodule on our
> servers but both of them are performance intensive
> Also clam signatures are prone to errors in some cases.
> Is there a good lighter alternative (commercial ok) that Mailscanner
> users may be using.
IMO - you've already got the best two.
Just convert to clamd instead of clamavmodule and fpscand (can't
remember if MailScanner supports this or not though).
More information about the MailScanner