OT: Which virus scanners to use
MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue Jan 12 10:16:46 GMT 2010
I use f-protd-6 and clamd (among others such as f-secure and sophossavi)
and neither of them are performance intensive at all.
The daemons use much less RAM and CPU than the command-line scanners,
that is why I wrote all the daemon support code.
On 12/01/2010 05:57, ram wrote:
> We have been running f-prot (commercial ) and clamavmodule on our
> servers but both of them are performance intensive
> Also clam signatures are prone to errors in some cases.
> Is there a good lighter alternative (commercial ok) that Mailscanner
> users may be using.
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
Need help customising MailScanner?
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
Follow me at twitter.com/JulesFM and twitter.com/MailScanner
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner