MailScanner scores different if ran manually
Mauricio Tavares
raubvogel at gmail.com
Thu Dec 2 15:26:05 GMT 2010
I got a spam email that went through mailscanner and got the following
score:
not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=4.45, required 4.7, BAYES_50
0.70, HDR_CYR 3.25, RAZOR2_CHECK 0.50)
Fine, so I ran it manually,
spamassassin -D -t --cf=/etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf spam.mail
and got the following score
Content analysis details: (6.55 points, 4.7 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.7 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
0.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 4 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
3.25 HDR_CYR HDR_CYR
Why did it score differently? Specifically why two out of three of the
razor checks were only done at the command line?
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list