MailScanner scores different if ran manually

[Martin Hepworth]

check that /etc/mail/spamassassin/MailScanner.conf (assuming local.cf is in
that dir too) is a sym link to /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf


-- 
Martin Hepworth
Oxford, UK


On 2 December 2010 15:26, Mauricio Tavares <raubvogel at gmail.com> wrote:

> I got a spam email that went through mailscanner and got the following
> score:
>
> not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=4.45, required 4.7, BAYES_50
> 0.70, HDR_CYR 3.25, RAZOR2_CHECK 0.50)
>
> Fine, so I ran it manually,
>
> spamassassin -D -t --cf=/etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf spam.mail
>
> and got the following score
>
> Content analysis details:   (6.55 points, 4.7 required)
>
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
>  0.7 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
>                            [score: 0.5000]
>  0.5 RAZOR2_CHECK           Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
>  1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 4 confidence level
>                            above 50%
>                            [cf: 100]
>  0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
>                            [cf: 100]
>  3.25 HDR_CYR                HDR_CYR
>
> Why did it score differently?  Specifically why two out of three of the
> razor checks were only done at the command line?
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20101202/bf9e7de8/attachment.html