Problem with SQLite detection

[Julian Field]

On 29/05/2009 10:12, Julian Field wrote:
>
>
> On 28/05/2009 16:54, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> Just came back from vacation and updated MailScanner on the first 
>> machine.
>> It started barking about SQLite. I had to disable the SA cache db and 
>> the
>> processing-messages database.
>>
>> First some observations which might call for slight improvements:
>>
>> It took me some time to find the correct config line to disable it. The
>> error mentions "processing-messages database", but the config doesn't
>> contain this sequence at all. I suggest either renaming the error 
>> message
>> to point to "Processing Attempts Database" (which would go to the next
>> config line) or mentioning "processing-messages database" in the
>> description of the "Maximum Processing Attempts" config option.
>>
>> Also, I got a bit confused first by the wording "Set this to 0 to 
>> disable
>> the limit.". I mean, even if disabled MS could still track and use 
>> the db.
>> It might help to rephrase it to "Set this to 0 to disable the limit and
>> the Processing Attempts Database."
>>
>> MailScanner --lint reports:
>> DBD::SQLite initialisation failed: Can't locate object method 
>> "driver" via
>> package "DBD::SQLite" at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-
>> thread-multi/DBI.pm line 770.
>>
>> Perhaps the capitalisation of DBD 'SQLite' isn't right. at
>> /usr/sbin/MailScanner line 1684
>>
>> And then the --lint errors out at this stage and doesn't finish. 
>> Should it
>> really do this?
> Many thanks for all that. As a result I have improved the --lint check 
> considerably and fixed all the log text relating to this database.
>> Now for the problem itself.
>> It seems the problem may lie in the rpmforge-packaged module I use. If I
>> downgrade the new version 1.25 to the old available version 1.14
>> MailScanner -v starts detecting DBD::SQLite again and the use of the
>> databases works.
>> I notice "6-4 Corrected DBD-SQLite packaging error." in the changelog.
>> Jules, could this have anything to do with the problem? I mean did you
>> correct a problem from upstream or in your own packaging only?
> It was just my packaging of it. It was superceded by the move to 1.25 
> anyway.
>> In order to find the nature of the change in the rpmforge packages it
>> might be helpful to know how the detection of the modules in MailScanner
>> -v works. Thanks.
> It just does a "require" on the module and then prints the 
> $Module::Name::VERSION value, which is the version number extracted 
> from the Perl code of the module. Every Perl package defines a 
> variable called VERSION.
>
> I ended up having to go to 1.25 or else it would not build properly on 
> a whole bunch of CentOS 4 systems.
>
> Jules
>
I have released 4.77.7 which includes the improvements I have mentioned 
above, which you may want to try it to see if you think it is good 
enough or needs further work.

Cheers,

Jules

-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
Follow me at twitter.com/JulesFM and twitter.com/MailScanner


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.