Desperately trying to debug poor spam scanning performance

[Steve Freegard]

Mark Nienberg wrote:
> Ben Tisdall wrote:
>> Steve Freegard wrote:
>>
>>  
>>> IMHO - Pyzor isn't usable anymore unless you are low-volume and can put
>>> up with the timeouts decreasing your scanner throughput, so I always
>>> either don't install it or disable it.
>>>
>>>     
>>
>> Interesting to hear your take on this, anyone else share this view?
>>
>>   
> Pyzor works well for me with the alternative pyzor server.  In your 
> .pyzor/servers file you should have
> 
> 82.94.255.100:24441
> 

I knew about this server - but I'd still rather not trust my mail 
throughput to a single point of failure that everyone is querying.

That's the biggest problem with Pyzor - the back-end has no easy way to 
replicate to slaves.

Cheers,
Steve.