Desperately trying to debug poor spam scanning performance
lists at tippingmar.com
Tue Sep 16 18:12:02 IST 2008
Steve Freegard wrote:
> Mark Nienberg wrote:
>> Pyzor works well for me with the alternative pyzor server. In your
>> .pyzor/servers file you should have
> I knew about this server - but I'd still rather not trust my mail
> throughput to a single point of failure that everyone is querying.
> That's the biggest problem with Pyzor - the back-end has no easy way
> to replicate to slaves.
Maybe it is because of my low volume (3000 msgs per day) but I haven't
seen a spamassassin timeout or any kind in about a year. But I see what
you mean about the pyzor server. I'm prepared to disable pyzor if it
ever starts timing out for me.
More information about the MailScanner