Desperately trying to debug poor spam scanning performance
lists at tippingmar.com
Tue Sep 16 17:44:13 IST 2008
Ben Tisdall wrote:
> Steve Freegard wrote:
>> IMHO - Pyzor isn't usable anymore unless you are low-volume and can put
>> up with the timeouts decreasing your scanner throughput, so I always
>> either don't install it or disable it.
> Interesting to hear your take on this, anyone else share this view?
Pyzor works well for me with the alternative pyzor server. In your
.pyzor/servers file you should have
More information about the MailScanner