Desperately trying to debug poor spam scanning performance
Richard Frovarp
richard.frovarp at sendit.nodak.edu
Tue Sep 16 15:27:57 IST 2008
Ben Tisdall wrote:
> Steve Freegard wrote:
>
>
>> IMHO - Pyzor isn't usable anymore unless you are low-volume and can put
>> up with the timeouts decreasing your scanner throughput, so I always
>> either don't install it or disable it.
>>
>> Even though it appears to be unwell on your machines anyway - disabling
>> it will prevent the need for the code to get loaded anyway.
>>
>
>
> Interesting to hear your take on this, anyone else share this view?
>
I dumped Pyzor long ago. The timeouts were killing performance. Razor
seems to work well enough.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list