AW: Using Spamd rather than the SpamAssassin Library
Drew Marshall
drew.marshall at technologytiger.net
Mon Sep 8 16:27:41 IST 2008
On 8 Sep 2008, at 14:13, Matt Hampton wrote:
> Drew Marshall wrote:
>>
>> One small question, so I can try to tune things a little more. How
>> does MS hand the batch over to spamd? Is this one batch per spamd
>> child? I have started spamd with an optimistic -m 30 and my MS 10
>> children are romping 20+ SA children, which seems a bit high.
> It does one per message - as there is the possibility that you are
> using a different user for each message. I haven't seen this cause
> a slowdown and even with 20 children, it will still be using less
> than 10 copies of the rules in MailScanner.
> Can you see what status they are in (it will be in the maillog)
Interesting... So there is the potential that with say 10 children,
each with 20 messages that I am going to need 200 SA children? I fear
I will have run out of memory by then! Hmm...
Drew
--
In line with our policy, this message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
content by Technology Tiger's Mail Launder system <www.mail-launder.com>
Our email policy can be found at www.technologytiger.net/policy
Technology Tiger Limited is registered in Scotland with registration number: 310997
Registered Office 55-57 West High Street Inverurie AB51 3QQ
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list