SARE Rules worth it?

[Martin Hepworth]

2008/11/14 Steve Campbell <campbell at cnpapers.com>:
>
>
> Martin Hepworth wrote:
>>
>> 2008/11/12 Devon Harding <devonharding at gmail.com>:
>>
>>>
>>> Is using the SARE rules in spamassassin still worth it?  I'm still
>>> getting
>>> quite a few obvious spam coming through and bayes is not cutting it.  I'm
>>> running MS 4.72 with SA 3.2.5 and all out of ideas.  Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> -Devon
>>>
>>> --
>>> MailScanner mailing list
>>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>>
>>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>>>
>>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Definitely worth it, also consider the sought.cf ruleset and of course
>> running sa-update on a regular (daily) basis.
>>
>>
>
> After visiting the taint.org site, and reviewing the sought.cf stuff, can
> someone explain to me whether I should somehow integrate this into my
> sa-update script that I already have, or whether I am supposed to use the
> script as standalone that the website provides.
>
> Thanks
>
> Steve Campbell
>

steve

the taint.org site tells you how to install the gpg key into sa-update
and use sa-update to update it regularly.

http://taint.org/2007/08/15/004348a.html

-- 
Martin Hepworth
Oxford, UK