SARE Rules worth it?

[Steve Campbell]

I think I found the answer in update_spamassassin - at least a leader to 
the answer.

Steve

Steve Campbell wrote:
>
>
> Martin Hepworth wrote:
>> 2008/11/12 Devon Harding <devonharding at gmail.com>:
>>  
>>> Is using the SARE rules in spamassassin still worth it?  I'm still 
>>> getting
>>> quite a few obvious spam coming through and bayes is not cutting 
>>> it.  I'm
>>> running MS 4.72 with SA 3.2.5 and all out of ideas.  Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> -Devon
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> MailScanner mailing list
>>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>>
>>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>>>
>>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>>>
>>>
>>>     
>>
>> Definitely worth it, also consider the sought.cf ruleset and of course
>> running sa-update on a regular (daily) basis.
>>
>>   
> After visiting the taint.org site, and reviewing the sought.cf stuff, 
> can someone explain to me whether I should somehow integrate this into 
> my sa-update script that I already have, or whether I am supposed to 
> use the script as standalone that the website provides.
>
> Thanks
>
> Steve Campbell
>