no spam score on may messages

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Raymond Norton wrote:
|  > Spamassassin is timing out, so the message is getting passed through.
| Have you tried the usuall like spamassassin -D --lint >and MailScanner
| --lint ?
|
|
|
| OK.. Found an issue with the incoming directory (recreated it), and an
| issue with the envelope header in
| /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf. Now things are working much
| better, but I am seeing some spam messages scored like this:
|
| cached	not	
|
| 	score=-9	
| 3	required	
| spam	autolearn=not	
| -9.00	BAYES_00	Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%

First off. The output of mailwatch is not the best way to quote the
results. The output is rather ackward.

Then there is the value you have assigned to a bayesian score of 0. That
is rather high.

My guess is that you have a very poor bayesian database that does not
match your traffic. WWhich is not unlekely if it was not properly trained.

I suggest you educate it by feeding it SPAM and HAM messages.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFINGZjBvzDRVjxmYERAmBQAJsH8p0mGv9O/mJGKvOYmP24yA/j7wCfW5r2
brqK/Y93GXjf82XfnZ+wIpU=
=bx2D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----