Postfix 2.5 with MailScanner?

[Glenn Steen]

On 23/03/2008, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>  Alex Broens wrote:
>  > On 3/23/2008 6:57 PM, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
>  >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  >> Hash: SHA1
>  >>
>  >> Alex Broens wrote:
>  >> | On 3/23/2008 5:28 PM, Glenn Steen wrote:
>  >> |> On 23/03/2008, Gerard <gerard at seibercom.net> wrote:
>  >> |>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:29:02 +0000
>  >> |>>  Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>  >> |>>
>  >> |>>  > Has anyone run Postfix 2.5 with MailScanner?
>  >> |>>  > Is it known to work okay?
>  >> |>>
>  >> |>>
>  >> |>> I suppose asking Wietse Venema is out of the question.
>  >> |>>
>  >> |>>  Actually, I did see one posting regarding it; however, it
>  >> received the
>  >> |>>  standard response that Mailscanner was not supported, etc. and that
>  >> |>>  ended the thread.
>  >> |>>
>  >> |>>  I will be configuring a new FreeBSD-7.0 machine shortly that
>  >> will have
>  >> |>>  Postfix-2.6 (current-beta) installed. However, that will not be for
>  >> |>>  another month or so. Sorry I could not help.
>  >> |>>
>  >> |> So you're skipping 2.5 altogether? I *might* be able tosqueeze this
>  >> |> in, but ... far from sure:-(. Would be great if someone already had
>  >> |> tried it all:-).
>  >> |
>  >> | Glenn
>  >> |
>  >> | I'm having an issue with MS/Postfix 2.5.1 and milter-link.
>  >> |
>  >> | MS won't process the msg after milter-link added its tags.
>  >> |
>  >> | A birdie told me you're the MailScanner Postfix Q file detective.
>  >> |
>  >> | wanna share my headache? :-)
>  >>
>  >> Not exactly your headache. But what do the headers look like before and
>  >> after milter-link has touched them?
>  >
>  > that is a question I can't really answer (yet) milter-link adds 1
>  > header and modifies the subject and MS chokes on the changes
>  > As the files are in Pfix Q format... it escapes my knowledge as to how
>  > to correctly take the file apart and see what the difference is.
>
> If I were you, I would leave that bit to Glenn. 'postcat' can print it
>  out nicely, but otherwise Glenn needs to look at the actual binary
>  structure really.
>
> >
>  > I can provide samples of the Pfix Q files which MS happily ignores and
>  > leaves in Hold Q to rot.
>
> Please send Glenn everything you have.
>
> >
>  >> I assume that if you just disable milter-link that everything is OK?
>  >> (OK, I did not assume, I just asked explicitly ;-)
>  >
>  > Yes, I did that... no milter-link tagging the msg, MS works.
>
> That's good to know. But can we analyse (and hopefully fix :-) the
>  problem quickly?
>
>  Thanks folks!
>
Doing my very best... Have a bit limited machines @home, but will
shift things over to a testbed at work and do this remotely. Hopefully
will know what happens to it in a few minutes/hours... Depending on
what the wife says...:-)

Cheers
-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se