Postfix 2.5 with MailScanner?

[Julian Field]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Alex Broens wrote:
> On 3/23/2008 6:57 PM, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Alex Broens wrote:
>> | On 3/23/2008 5:28 PM, Glenn Steen wrote:
>> |> On 23/03/2008, Gerard <gerard at seibercom.net> wrote:
>> |>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:29:02 +0000
>> |>>  Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>> |>>
>> |>>  > Has anyone run Postfix 2.5 with MailScanner?
>> |>>  > Is it known to work okay?
>> |>>
>> |>>
>> |>> I suppose asking Wietse Venema is out of the question.
>> |>>
>> |>>  Actually, I did see one posting regarding it; however, it 
>> received the
>> |>>  standard response that Mailscanner was not supported, etc. and that
>> |>>  ended the thread.
>> |>>
>> |>>  I will be configuring a new FreeBSD-7.0 machine shortly that 
>> will have
>> |>>  Postfix-2.6 (current-beta) installed. However, that will not be for
>> |>>  another month or so. Sorry I could not help.
>> |>>
>> |> So you're skipping 2.5 altogether? I *might* be able tosqueeze this
>> |> in, but ... far from sure:-(. Would be great if someone already had
>> |> tried it all:-).
>> |
>> | Glenn
>> |
>> | I'm having an issue with MS/Postfix 2.5.1 and milter-link.
>> |
>> | MS won't process the msg after milter-link added its tags.
>> |
>> | A birdie told me you're the MailScanner Postfix Q file detective.
>> |
>> | wanna share my headache? :-)
>>
>> Not exactly your headache. But what do the headers look like before and
>> after milter-link has touched them?
>
> that is a question I can't really answer (yet) milter-link adds 1 
> header and modifies the subject and MS chokes on the changes
> As the files are in Pfix Q format... it escapes my knowledge as to how 
> to correctly take the file apart and see what the difference is.
If I were you, I would leave that bit to Glenn. 'postcat' can print it 
out nicely, but otherwise Glenn needs to look at the actual binary 
structure really.
>
> I can provide samples of the Pfix Q files which MS happily ignores and 
> leaves in Hold Q to rot.
Please send Glenn everything you have.
>
>> I assume that if you just disable milter-link that everything is OK?
>> (OK, I did not assume, I just asked explicitly ;-)
>
> Yes, I did that... no milter-link tagging the msg, MS works.
That's good to know. But can we analyse (and hopefully fix :-) the 
problem quickly?

Thanks folks!

Jules

- -- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
PGP public key: http://www.jules.fm/julesfm.asc


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.8.2 (Build 3005)
Comment: Use Thunderbird Enigmail to verify this message
Charset: ISO-8859-1

wj8DBQFH5rggEfZZRxQVtlQRAixPAJ0UE1tvgt/RF/KfAz/94l8cWjSKXgCdHYc0
1kywqWYeqstL4DBNG/0qxNI=
=3dad
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.