Postfix 2.5 with MailScanner?

[Alex Broens]

On 3/23/2008 6:57 PM, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Alex Broens wrote:
> | On 3/23/2008 5:28 PM, Glenn Steen wrote:
> |> On 23/03/2008, Gerard <gerard at seibercom.net> wrote:
> |>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:29:02 +0000
> |>>  Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> |>>
> |>>  > Has anyone run Postfix 2.5 with MailScanner?
> |>>  > Is it known to work okay?
> |>>
> |>>
> |>> I suppose asking Wietse Venema is out of the question.
> |>>
> |>>  Actually, I did see one posting regarding it; however, it received the
> |>>  standard response that Mailscanner was not supported, etc. and that
> |>>  ended the thread.
> |>>
> |>>  I will be configuring a new FreeBSD-7.0 machine shortly that will have
> |>>  Postfix-2.6 (current-beta) installed. However, that will not be for
> |>>  another month or so. Sorry I could not help.
> |>>
> |> So you're skipping 2.5 altogether? I *might* be able tosqueeze this
> |> in, but ... far from sure:-(. Would be great if someone already had
> |> tried it all:-).
> |
> | Glenn
> |
> | I'm having an issue with MS/Postfix 2.5.1 and milter-link.
> |
> | MS won't process the msg after milter-link added its tags.
> |
> | A birdie told me you're the MailScanner Postfix Q file detective.
> |
> | wanna share my headache? :-)
> 
> Not exactly your headache. But what do the headers look like before and
> after milter-link has touched them?

that is a question I can't really answer (yet) milter-link adds 1 header 
and modifies the subject and MS chokes on the changes
As the files are in Pfix Q format... it escapes my knowledge as to how 
to correctly take the file apart and see what the difference is.

I can provide samples of the Pfix Q files which MS happily ignores and 
leaves in Hold Q to rot.

> I assume that if you just disable milter-link that everything is OK?
> (OK, I did not assume, I just asked explicitly ;-)

Yes, I did that... no milter-link tagging the msg, MS works.

Alex