MailScanner 4.66.5 woes on Centos 5.1

Hugo van der Kooij hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Sun Feb 17 12:34:21 GMT 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Julian Field wrote:
|
|
| Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
|> * PGP Signed by an unverified key: 02/17/08 at 10:51:01
|
|> Julian Field wrote:
|> | How did you upgrade?
|> | Did you run install.sh?
|
|> I upgraded the packages through yum and installed the MailScanner RPM
|> with rpm -Uvh manually.
|
|> I do not use that script as I have found that I do not wish to screw up
|> yet another system with the --force option. I have paid too high a price
|> to accept that option ever again with rpm.
| It's just that my install.sh script writes a .rpmmacros file for you
| that stops all the RPM build errors you were seeing. If you do it all
| yourself, sorry, but don't expect too much sympathy :-)

I disabled the specific check in MailScanner as a test and MailScanner
works just fine from what I can tell. I am currently doing a full set of
tests.

I can not find specificly what did not work witout this perl IO module
in the past months. Can anyone remember that bit of information?

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHuCnLBvzDRVjxmYERAsb+AKC3qAWOJWhVsJicq1hjfd4X9qtaOQCdHB1h
XjI3AX34yEjwHGbPlgDGVzs=
=ph1C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the MailScanner mailing list