Upgrade Issues

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christo Bezuidenhout wrote:
> We currently use MailScanner 4.65.3 We never needed to upgrade to later
> versions. I see some nice features in the latest versions that we can
> use. What would be the issues that I need to look out for when upgrading
> to the latest version. We also use Clam 0.90.2. This I will also have to
> update with SA.

You need more perl modules. To the best of my knowledge you will need to
add at least:  perl-OLE-Storage_Lite

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIrw0YBvzDRVjxmYERAltCAJ9V7I+/gUC5STtM2s1JDd7jYJi5fACgpEyR
KR77E0FY8rhhgg+5SD1G8q8=
=0f9N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----