ssilva at sgvwater.com
Fri Aug 22 17:34:03 IST 2008
on 8-22-2008 7:33 AM Christo Bezuidenhout spake the following:
> We currently use MailScanner 4.65.3 We never needed to upgrade to later
> versions. I see some nice features in the latest versions that we can
> use. What would be the issues that I need to look out for when upgrading
> to the latest version. We also use Clam 0.90.2. This I will also have to
> update with SA.
You really shouldn't let clam get that far behind. Usually more than 3
versions back and your updates start missing things that the newer engines
would catch. I would really recommend running clamd and using that with a
newer version of MailScanner. The speed is slightly faster than the clam perl
module, but the memory usage is much less.
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20080822/a147eb8a/signature.bin
More information about the MailScanner