Rule to BCC recipients

[Eduardo Casarero]

use milter-ahead or so, at MTA level managing unknown users is much better!

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Ricardo Francis
<hacking.in.progress at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm running MailScanner-4.67.6-1 + Sendmail 8.14.xx + ClamAV and it has been
> a great help to scan +200k mails.
>
> Due to the high rate of email to unknown users (~80%), I had to change the
> "Scan Messages" and "Virus Scanning" to rules file:
>
> I've created a list of email addresses based on passwd + aliases file to
> force scans on these email addresses only and, by default, the rest is not
> scanned because they're being redirected to /dev/null .
>
>  The rule says:
>
> To: user at domain.com yes
>
> But email addresses in BCC are not checked at all.
> Let's say a message enters the system TO user unknown at domain.com and to
> validuser at domain.com in BCC. The message to unknown at domain.com is discarded
> and the one to validuser at domain.com is delivered with no scan at all because
> it did not match any rule to do it.
>
> My question is, is there any way to include the BCC addresses in those rules
> files?
>
> Thanks and congratulations for the best mail filter around.
> Ric.
>
>
> --
>  MailScanner mailing list
>  mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>  http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>  Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
>  Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>