MailScanner ignoring some rules
Hugo van der Kooij
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Sat Apr 5 07:44:45 IST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
TecnoWay Digital wrote:
| Julian, another information about my server.
|
| I'm using mailwatch too.
|
| If the mailbox marketing at silmaq.com.br is not set to be scanned,
| why it continue been logged to mailWatch SQL ?
| I imagine the "MailWatch.pm" is called from MailScanner to log only
| scanned messages.
No. You have called upon MS to look at the message. So the message gets
logged by MS. Even when after a minimal glance it decided not to scan
the content for ......
Actually I put a lot of other info in the same table by parsing the
postfix syslog file. Just to make sure I present the whole picture in
the tables for my family.
There are limits to MailWatch 1 and I am not sure how many of them will
be tackled in v2 and wether or not I will actually ever use MailWatch
v2. But that is a discussion for another mailinglist.
Hugo.
- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH9x/bBvzDRVjxmYERAgm5AJ9BAy5hGz1RhjH7kFJ6qSDoPgrQLwCgrkQa
c/vm2DOOkAQwOhef82CZ/Uc=
=SpRF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list