X-Spam-Status header enhancements

shuttlebox shuttlebox at gmail.com
Fri Nov 2 23:49:12 GMT 2007


On 11/3/07, Michael Mansour <micoots at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently started to use the option:
>
> FromOrTo:       default                         deliver store-spam header
> "X-Spam-Status: Yes"
>
> in my spam.actions.rules file, but most recently noticed messages with
> headers of the form:
>
> X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
> X-Spam-Report:      1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
> bl.spamcop.net
>       [Blocked - see
> <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?125.116.99.168>]
>       1.7 INVALID_MSGID Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822
> X-Spam-Flag: YES (tagged as spam, score 3.0)
>
> sent by some mail systems.
>
> Can MailScanner extend on the "X-Spam-Status: Yes" facility looking like the
> X-Spam-Flag above (sent by whatever scanning system they have)?
>
> What do others think?

For filtering it adds nothing and for the few who looks at the headers
it doesn't matter what header the info is in. If you log spam you have
a header which contains all that and the rule hits as well.

-- 
/peter


More information about the MailScanner mailing list