"Intention Analysis"

Glenn Steen glenn.steen at gmail.com
Fri Mar 2 09:40:57 CET 2007

On 02/03/07, Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, am.lists wrote:
> > On 3/1/07, Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org> wrote:
> >>  I am a restricted in my statements in this matter as I have actuall access
> >>  to them for support activities. So I will not go in details here!
> >
> > Usually, having access to support <> being under an NDA. If you're not
> > under NDA, then by all means, please share. If you are under NDA,
> > please share off-list. :-) Just kidding, of course.
> Most of it is under NDA. But at times there seems to be conflict between
> NDA and GPL in my view.
> >> Having said that I do not have a Barracuda at home but I do run
> >> MailScanner. With MailWatch added I have the main functionality for the
> >> rest of the family added.
> >
> > Are you saying that minus the Barracuda, but with MS/MW, your opinion
> > is that you have equivalent (or near-equivalent) functionality?
> The Barracuda solution is fine for those networks whose admins find
> clicking on the right spots in exchange is a challenge. It has a decent
> set of tools and it is actively maintained so at present I find it is the
> best boxed solution you can find with a reasonably good track record.
Hm, have you compared this in-depth with DefenderMX (which is
available in an appliance as well as not:)? DefenderMX is the
commercial variant of MailScanner/MailWatch sold by FSL, if you
haven't heard of it.

-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se

More information about the MailScanner mailing list