New Beta 4.58.6 released

[Glenn Steen]

OFF TOPIC! Don't read unless you really want to spend the time!!!
You've been warned:-)

On 29/01/07, Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com> wrote:
> Glenn Steen spake the following on 1/29/2007 11:34 AM:
> > On 29/01/07, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Gerard Seibert wrote:
> >> > On Monday January 29, 2007 at 04:00:48 (AM) Glenn Steen wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> On 29/01/07, Mike Jakubik <mikej at rogers.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Julian Field wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> There was 1 serious bug in 4.58.5 which I have now hopefully fixed.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> *Please* give this version a try as I don't intend changing anything
> >> >>>> before the 1st Feb stable release unless you notify me of any
> >> problems
> >> >>>> or bugs.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Support for the 'p' records in Postfix 2.3/2.4 will have to wait for
> >> >>>> the next release of MailScanner, personally I think it is a nasty
> >> >>>> bodge. I wouldn't be at all surprised if Weitse changed his mind on
> >> >>>> this topic, he certainly should do.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> Julian,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Could you give a little more detail as to what 'p' records are,
> >> and how
> >> >>> this will affect MS's compatibility with postfix?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks.
> >> >>>
> >> >> Mike,
> >> >>
> >> >> Download the postfix source and read the comment in
> >> >> src/cleanup/cleanup_milter.c (starts on line 114 in the version 2.3.6
> >> >> sources). This is so far the best explanation of what it is I've
> >> >> found.
> >> >>
> >> >> If we manage to implement "support" for it correctly, it'll not change
> >> >> the support/non-support status of postfix one whit (Jules still
> >> >> supports it, Wietse will still see us as more evil than the horned
> >> >> devil for perusing the queue files directly... Well, perhaps not that
> >> >> evil, but close:-).
> >> >>
> >> >> We aim at making "milter edited queue files" -> "a (new) normal
> >> queue file".
> >> >>
> >> >> If you want my patches to look at beforehand, I can get them to you in
> >> >> a blink:-). So far they've been tested by me and Nerijus Baliunas (who
> >> >> is a brave soul and seems to be running them in production:-). They're
> >> >> good for 2.3 with milters, not yet 2.4 with body editing milters.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > I posted the original post regarding 'p' records on the Postfix forum,
> >> > and these are two of the responses that I received.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Software that depends on Postfix INTERNAL interfaces breaks the
> >> > warranty.
> >> Since when did his software come with a warranty? Ooohh, can I sue him
> >> please? Please?
> >>
> >> Jules
> >>
> > ROFL!
> > Thanks Jules... Really needed that today. Oh well, enough play... Back
> > to playing at being a plumber... (Sometimes I really don't like my
> > house:)
> >
> I am real good at plumbing! Now where is that 10,000 mile pipewrench?
> ;-D
I could've used the help.... Oh well, all tight now, no leaks (that I
know of)....:-).
I really hate it, pipes, water muck and all...
Estimated time: 1 hour
Real time: 4 hours.
Reason: Midway through, with everything in bits ... I realise I didn't
buy the right connectors... time to salvage the bits and pieces and
try combine with the new ones. Sigh.

BTW, of all the off-topic posts I've made lately... This one has to
take the price:-).

Cheers
-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se