New Beta 4.58.6 released

[Scott Silva]

Glenn Steen spake the following on 1/29/2007 11:34 AM:
> On 29/01/07, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Gerard Seibert wrote:
>> > On Monday January 29, 2007 at 04:00:48 (AM) Glenn Steen wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 29/01/07, Mike Jakubik <mikej at rogers.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Julian Field wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> There was 1 serious bug in 4.58.5 which I have now hopefully fixed.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *Please* give this version a try as I don't intend changing anything
>> >>>> before the 1st Feb stable release unless you notify me of any
>> problems
>> >>>> or bugs.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Support for the 'p' records in Postfix 2.3/2.4 will have to wait for
>> >>>> the next release of MailScanner, personally I think it is a nasty
>> >>>> bodge. I wouldn't be at all surprised if Weitse changed his mind on
>> >>>> this topic, he certainly should do.
>> >>>>
>> >>> Julian,
>> >>>
>> >>> Could you give a little more detail as to what 'p' records are,
>> and how
>> >>> this will affect MS's compatibility with postfix?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks.
>> >>>
>> >> Mike,
>> >>
>> >> Download the postfix source and read the comment in
>> >> src/cleanup/cleanup_milter.c (starts on line 114 in the version 2.3.6
>> >> sources). This is so far the best explanation of what it is I've
>> >> found.
>> >>
>> >> If we manage to implement "support" for it correctly, it'll not change
>> >> the support/non-support status of postfix one whit (Jules still
>> >> supports it, Wietse will still see us as more evil than the horned
>> >> devil for perusing the queue files directly... Well, perhaps not that
>> >> evil, but close:-).
>> >>
>> >> We aim at making "milter edited queue files" -> "a (new) normal
>> queue file".
>> >>
>> >> If you want my patches to look at beforehand, I can get them to you in
>> >> a blink:-). So far they've been tested by me and Nerijus Baliunas (who
>> >> is a brave soul and seems to be running them in production:-). They're
>> >> good for 2.3 with milters, not yet 2.4 with body editing milters.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I posted the original post regarding 'p' records on the Postfix forum,
>> > and these are two of the responses that I received.
>> >
>> >
>> > Software that depends on Postfix INTERNAL interfaces breaks the
>> > warranty.
>> Since when did his software come with a warranty? Ooohh, can I sue him
>> please? Please?
>>
>> Jules
>>
> ROFL!
> Thanks Jules... Really needed that today. Oh well, enough play... Back
> to playing at being a plumber... (Sometimes I really don't like my
> house:)
> 
I am real good at plumbing! Now where is that 10,000 mile pipewrench?
;-D


-- 

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!