SA, MS, RBL problem

[Vasiliy Boulytchev]

Problem solved, I had to forward combined.njabl.org in named conf on the 
cachers... duh!

THANKS!

Vasiliy Boulytchev
vasiliy at linuxspecial.com



Vasiliy Boulytchev wrote:
>
> Excellent,
>    Now we are in the right direction.
>
>    Now. I use the NJABL-provided rsync syntax to sync...
>
>
>  
> $ cat /usr/local/bin/njablrsync
> #!/bin/sh
>
> rsync -vaL rsync.njabl.org::njabl/rbldnsd/ /var/dnsbl/njabl/
>
> which provides me with:
>
> ls /var/lib/rbldns/work/
> bhnc.gz               dnsbl.njabl.org.data     
> rbldns.dynablock.easynet.nl
> dnsbl.njabl.org.auto  dnsbl.njabl.org.generic  README
>
> How come am I not getting the combined?  And so how do I set SA to use 
> my current dnsbl.njabl.org,
>
> THANKS!
>
> Vasiliy Boulytchev
> vasiliy at linuxspecial.com
>
>
>
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:46:28AM -0500, Vasiliy Boulytchev wrote:
>>  
>>> be tested via dig @dnscacheserver 2.0.0.127.dnsbl.njabl.org... i see 
>>>     
>> [...]
>>  
>>> Can someone please help me setup NJABL properly?  I am invoking SA 
>>> via MS... as you can see below, SA does seem to check NJABL...
>>>     
>> [...]
>>  
>>> [15101] dbg: dns: checking RBL combined.njabl.org., set 
>>> njabl-lastexternal
>>> [15101] dbg: dns: checking RBL combined.njabl.org., set njabl
>>>     
>>
>> SpamAssassin is looking for combined.dnsbl.org.  You've setup your 
>> servers to
>> deal with dnsbl.njabl.org, which is different, and so won't be used.
>>
>>