Greetpause seems very ineffective (Was: RE: Increased Volumes Of Spam)

Scott Silva ssilva at sgvwater.com
Sat Jan 20 01:52:50 CET 2007


Durval Menezes spake the following on 1/19/2007 4:05 PM:
> Hello folks,
> 
> Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com> on Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:24:11 -0800, wrote:
>> Greetpause does help a lot, as I probably drop 10 to 20% of the spam with it
>> alone. Five seconds is a good starting point, but probably not over 30
>> seconds.
> 
> The first time I became aware of GreetPause, I dismissed it as probably
> not very effective, because it would be very simple for spammers to adapt
> by just stopping the slam; on the negative side, it would end up slowing
> ALL traffic, including the legitimate (non-spam) emails.
> 
> Then I came upon Scott's (and others) recommendations, as above, and I
> wondered if my initial analysis was incorrect; today, I found the time
> to configure one of my servers to use GreetPause, and measured its
> efficiency using pause intervals of 1s, 5s and 10s. The numbers I
> obtained are as follows:
> 
> Pause:    GreetPause:  total connections:	pre-greet/conexoes:
> 1s     		 14          645         	2.17%
> 5s      	 19          383         	4.96%
> 10s      	 36          535         	6.73%
> 
> What's worse, about 80% of the connections blocked by GreetPause would
> have been blocked anyway by the MTA using RBLs alone, so the *effective*
> Greetpause improvement over using RBLs alone would be about 1% or less,
> even with relativelly large (10s) pauses.
> 
> I've rechecked my analysis and found no mistakes; are you folks *really*
> measuring GreetPause efficiency and finding these 10-20% numbers, or are
> you deriving these numbers more from "feeling" or something? What other
> explanations for the above discrepancies can you think of?
> 
> If anyone wants to sift through my logs, I can make then avalable;
> just ask.
> 
> Thanks in advance for any and all input.
> 
> Best Regards,
Many cannot use all the good blacklists, and greetpause does catch some of the
newer spammers that haven't hit the blacklists yet.

-- 

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!



More information about the MailScanner mailing list