OT: Freds Rules

[Scott Silva]

Dimitri Yioulos spake the following on 1/4/2007 4:47 AM:
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 6:45 pm, ajos1 at onion.demon.co.uk wrote:
>> -
>>
>> I have  ... the following and I see not a single reference to fh_date
>>
>> # Fred's Header rules
>> # Version:  1.04.08
>> # Created:  08/20/2003
>> # Modified: 01/02/2007
>> # Current Home: http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/88_FVGT_headers.cf
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> Subj: Re: OT: Freds Rules
>> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:37:24 -0600
>>
>> Scott Silva wrote:
>>> David Vosburgh spake the following on 1/3/2007 3:04 PM:
>>>> Anyone else seeing a problem with the rules FH_DATE_ISNT_2006 and
>>>> FH_DATE_ISNT_200X (in 88_FVGT_headers.cf) now that the new year has
>>>> started?  I've just modified mine to account for the new year.
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>> What version are you using?
>>> Some of Fred's rules were updated yesterday
>> 1.04.07. I update all the RDJ's at 4am each morning, and it didn't
>> change this morning. Thanks.
>>
> 
> Yesterday, having seen the problems caused by 88_FVGT_headers.cf, I edited the 
> FH_DATE_ISNT_2006 and FH_DATE_ISNT_200X rules to change 2006 to 2007 --> end 
> of problems.  However, I don't know what the implications of these changes 
> are.  Would someone be kind enough to explain?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Dimitri
> 
Since that isn't present in the current rules, I wouldn't worry about it. Just
download the current version and replace the old one.

-- 

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!