OT: Freds Rules

[Dimitri Yioulos]

On Wednesday 03 January 2007 6:45 pm, ajos1 at onion.demon.co.uk wrote:
> -
>
> I have  ... the following and I see not a single reference to fh_date
>
> # Fred's Header rules
> # Version:  1.04.08
> # Created:  08/20/2003
> # Modified: 01/02/2007
> # Current Home: http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/88_FVGT_headers.cf
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Subj: Re: OT: Freds Rules
> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:37:24 -0600
>
> Scott Silva wrote:
> > David Vosburgh spake the following on 1/3/2007 3:04 PM:
> >>Anyone else seeing a problem with the rules FH_DATE_ISNT_2006 and
> >>FH_DATE_ISNT_200X (in 88_FVGT_headers.cf) now that the new year has
> >>started?  I've just modified mine to account for the new year.
> >>
> >>Dave
> >
> > What version are you using?
> > Some of Fred's rules were updated yesterday
>
> 1.04.07. I update all the RDJ's at 4am each morning, and it didn't
> change this morning. Thanks.
>

Yesterday, having seen the problems caused by 88_FVGT_headers.cf, I edited the 
FH_DATE_ISNT_2006 and FH_DATE_ISNT_200X rules to change 2006 to 2007 --> end 
of problems.  However, I don't know what the implications of these changes 
are.  Would someone be kind enough to explain?

Thanks.

Dimitri

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.