OT: Freds Rules

[Dimitri Yioulos]

On Thursday 04 January 2007 11:57 am, Scott Silva wrote:
> Dimitri Yioulos spake the following on 1/4/2007 4:47 AM:
> > On Wednesday 03 January 2007 6:45 pm, ajos1 at onion.demon.co.uk wrote:
> >> -
> >>
> >> I have  ... the following and I see not a single reference to fh_date
> >>
> >> # Fred's Header rules
> >> # Version:  1.04.08
> >> # Created:  08/20/2003
> >> # Modified: 01/02/2007
> >> # Current Home: http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/88_FVGT_headers.cf
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> >> Subj: Re: OT: Freds Rules
> >> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:37:24 -0600
> >>
> >> Scott Silva wrote:
> >>> David Vosburgh spake the following on 1/3/2007 3:04 PM:
> >>>> Anyone else seeing a problem with the rules FH_DATE_ISNT_2006 and
> >>>> FH_DATE_ISNT_200X (in 88_FVGT_headers.cf) now that the new year has
> >>>> started?  I've just modified mine to account for the new year.
> >>>>
> >>>> Dave
> >>>
> >>> What version are you using?
> >>> Some of Fred's rules were updated yesterday
> >>
> >> 1.04.07. I update all the RDJ's at 4am each morning, and it didn't
> >> change this morning. Thanks.
> >
> > Yesterday, having seen the problems caused by 88_FVGT_headers.cf, I
> > edited the FH_DATE_ISNT_2006 and FH_DATE_ISNT_200X rules to change 2006
> > to 2007 --> end of problems.  However, I don't know what the implications
> > of these changes are.  Would someone be kind enough to explain?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Dimitri
>
> Since that isn't present in the current rules, I wouldn't worry about it.
> Just download the current version and replace the old one.
>
> --
>

Thanks, Scott, I'll do that.

Dimitri

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.