mailscanner 4.66.4-3 reccomendation

[Julian Field]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The only "beta" thing about it is the install.sh. It should install fine 
on CentOS 5.1.
Please let me know if it doesn't.

James N. Smith wrote:
> Need some advice from the list.  I am doing a new install based on 
> CentOS 5.1.  I have run into the MailTools v.2 problem trying to run 
> MailScanner 4.65.3-1.
>
> Is it recommended to use the MailScanner 4.66.4-3 Beta with MailTools 
> 2.02 or try to revert to an older version of MailTools and use the 
> stable MailScanner?
>
> More specifically, is 4.66.4-3 a reliable beta (more akin to a Release 
> Candidate) or is it more "buyer beware"?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> James

Jules

- -- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.7.0 (Build 867)
Comment: (pgp-secured)
Charset: ISO-8859-1

wj8DBQFHYP5YEfZZRxQVtlQRAuPTAJ44qzxY1NCZkPJZDhw86Vt/9CMzrgCfYJ35
ZS0JRKLbcG8m8hz1f235MpU=
=mQPI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.