[Fwd: Re: Spamhaus issues? (fwd)]

[Mike Kercher]

Good ridance!  Well done, Jules.

Mike
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info 
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf 
> Of Julian Field
> Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 5:59 AM
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: [Fwd: Re: Spamhaus issues? (fwd)]
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> This is the comment I got from Res in reply to my gentle tap 
> on the shoulder.
> I've had enough of his attitude for a very long time. Sorry, 
> but he asked for it.
> 
> - -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: Spamhaus issues? (fwd)
> Date: 	Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:42:59 +1000 (EST)
> From: 	Res <res at ausics.net>
> To: 	Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> 
> 
> 
> Its about as on topic as the rest of the crud around on list, 
> so is this selective censorship I am seeing... probably, 
> since you dont make a point of shutting down all off topic 
> threads. If you want me off your list just unsub me, you have 
> my blessing, as I doubt I contribute anything to the 
> mailscanner community anyway. Remember to take me off the 
> beta list as well.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:27:33 +0100
> From: Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> Reply-To: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> To: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Subject: Re: Spamhaus issues?
> 
> - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> C'mon guys, let's call it a day for this thread. The 
> discussion is no longer relevant to others. If you wish to 
> argue/debate/discuss, feel free, just do it off-list.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jules.
> 
> Res wrote:
> > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> > *yawn*
> > I got your point Kai, the fact is you introduced something 
> (dynamic ip
> > blocks) into the debate that was completely irrelevant, pay closer 
> > attention next time.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> >
> >> Res wrote on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 07:54:58 +1000 (EST):
> >>
> >>> *sigh*
> >>
> >> Indeed, you didn't get the point from the beginning and 
> are still not 
> >> getting it and are not even trying to get it. EOT.
> >>
> >> Kai
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> Jules
> 
> - --
> Julian Field MEng CITP
> www.MailScanner.info
> Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
> 
> MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
> Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM
> 
> PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 
> B654 For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014)
> Charset: ISO-8859-1
> 
> wj8DBQFGvuf0EfZZRxQVtlQRAmkAAKDpnvFWY4ZnG1vBn+K+KqSlL2g7dgCgsInB
> 7794Ez8nQvi2tpHRyeamCqI=
> =1tzv
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk
> 
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> 
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> 
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website! 
>