Time Spent on Spam
res at ausics.net
Fri Apr 13 03:21:07 IST 2007
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Peter Russell wrote:
> We are reviewing our spam defences. A review in the sense of our polices,
> should we store low scoring spam and send reports, or forward to modded
> subjects and config outlook rules etc
You could mark low score spam as attachment.
In your rules dir find the respective message, and edit it, explaining to
all what how why, since I did this, I have had NO querries about why
MailScanner is blocking/refusing X, Y or Z.
However, the first few lines should be a brief explanation, because
lets face it, no user wants to read a 200 line email in entirety, it's
like us expecting them to read the terms and conditions, they say they
do, but we know they don't :)
Then under, give a full and detailed explanation, DO NOT let legals write
it, get ur juniors to do it, then find the most computer illiterate person
in your company and get them to read it and see if they understand it, if
they do, your home and hosed.
Let Novell know what you think of their back door deal with the devil.
Sign the petition today: http://techp.org/p/1/
More information about the MailScanner