dcc logs

Ugo Bellavance ugob at camo-route.com
Wed Nov 1 02:47:47 GMT 2006

Lars Kristiansen wrote:
> shuttlebox skrev:
>> On 10/31/06, Ugo Bellavance <ugob at camo-route.com> wrote:
>>> I'll try to do it if I can find some time.  BTW I think this only
>>> happens when one uses dccifd.  Correct me if I'm wrong but if you're
>>> only using dccproc, you don't have those logs...
>> That's correct.
> Does this apply?
>  From http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/dcc-tree/dccproc.html :
> "
> If dccproc is run more than 500 times in fewer than 5000 seconds, 
> dccproc tries to start Dccifd(8).  The attempt is made at most once per 
> hour. Dccifd is significantly more efficient than dccproc.  With luck, 
> mecha-nisms such as SpamAssassin will notice when dccifd is running and 
> switch to dccifd.
> "

Maybe it does, but is it fairly easy (see the wiki entry) to set up 
Dccifd, so I think it is worth setting it up.  At worse, if Dccifd is 
not available, SpamAssassin falls back to dccproc.

More information about the MailScanner mailing list