Thoughts please: 4.54.4 as a stable?

[Denis Beauchemin]

Julian Field a écrit :
> Denis Beauchemin wrote:
>> Julian Field a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> Nick Smith wrote:
>>>> Just wondering - was this deliberate (4.54.5 vs 4.54.2)?
>>>>
>>>> bash-3.00# diff -ur /opt/MailScanner/etc/filetype.rules.conf.orig
>>>> filetype.rules.conf
>>>> --- /opt/MailScanner/etc/filetype.rules.conf.orig       Wed Apr 12 
>>>> 09:45:43 2006
>>>> +++ filetype.rules.conf.orig    Tue May 23 07:52:42 2006
>>>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>>>> # If none of the rules match, then the filetype is allowed.
>>>>
>>>> allow  text            -                       -
>>>> -allow  script          -                       -
>>>> +allow  \sscript        -                       -
>>>> allow  archive         -                       -
>>>> allow  postscript      -                       -
>>>> deny   self-extract    No self-extracting archives     No
>>>> self-extracting archives allowed
>>> Entirely intentional. Matching on "script" matches "postscript" as 
>>> well, which isn't what I wanted. Matching "\sscript" will match a 
>>> space followed by the word "script".
>>>
>> Julian,
>>
>> Wouldn't it be safer to use \bscript instead?  It would also match at 
>> the beginning of the line or after some special character.
> But that would catch '-script' which I don't want to. I really do want 
> just "foobar script".
>
Who am I to even think THE GREAT ONE could make such a small mistake! ;-)

Denis

-- 
   _
  °v°   Denis Beauchemin, analyste
 /(_)\  Université de Sherbrooke, S.T.I.
  ^ ^   T: 819.821.8000x2252 F: 819.821.8045


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3226 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20060529/dbc8dba5/smime.bin