Thoughts please: 4.54.4 as a stable?
Julian Field
MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Sat May 27 13:55:28 IST 2006
Denis Beauchemin wrote:
> Julian Field a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Nick Smith wrote:
>>> Just wondering - was this deliberate (4.54.5 vs 4.54.2)?
>>>
>>> bash-3.00# diff -ur /opt/MailScanner/etc/filetype.rules.conf.orig
>>> filetype.rules.conf
>>> --- /opt/MailScanner/etc/filetype.rules.conf.orig Wed Apr 12
>>> 09:45:43 2006
>>> +++ filetype.rules.conf.orig Tue May 23 07:52:42 2006
>>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>>> # If none of the rules match, then the filetype is allowed.
>>>
>>> allow text - -
>>> -allow script - -
>>> +allow \sscript - -
>>> allow archive - -
>>> allow postscript - -
>>> deny self-extract No self-extracting archives No
>>> self-extracting archives allowed
>> Entirely intentional. Matching on "script" matches "postscript" as
>> well, which isn't what I wanted. Matching "\sscript" will match a
>> space followed by the word "script".
>>
> Julian,
>
> Wouldn't it be safer to use \bscript instead? It would also match at
> the beginning of the line or after some special character.
But that would catch '-script' which I don't want to. I really do want
just "foobar script".
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list