Thoughts please: 4.54.4 as a stable?

[Denis Beauchemin]

Julian Field a écrit :
>
>
> Nick Smith wrote:
>> Just wondering - was this deliberate (4.54.5 vs 4.54.2)?
>>
>> bash-3.00# diff -ur /opt/MailScanner/etc/filetype.rules.conf.orig
>> filetype.rules.conf
>> --- /opt/MailScanner/etc/filetype.rules.conf.orig       Wed Apr 12 
>> 09:45:43 2006
>> +++ filetype.rules.conf.orig    Tue May 23 07:52:42 2006
>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>> # If none of the rules match, then the filetype is allowed.
>>
>> allow  text            -                       -
>> -allow  script          -                       -
>> +allow  \sscript        -                       -
>> allow  archive         -                       -
>> allow  postscript      -                       -
>> deny   self-extract    No self-extracting archives     No
>> self-extracting archives allowed
> Entirely intentional. Matching on "script" matches "postscript" as 
> well, which isn't what I wanted. Matching "\sscript" will match a 
> space followed by the word "script".
>
Julian,

Wouldn't it be safer to use \bscript instead?  It would also match at 
the beginning of the line or after some special character.

Denis

-- 
   _
  °v°   Denis Beauchemin, analyste
 /(_)\  Université de Sherbrooke, S.T.I.
  ^ ^   T: 819.821.8000x2252 F: 819.821.8045


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3226 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20060526/030a3978/smime.bin