Attn. postfix users WAS Multiple Postfix smtp instances

[Glenn Steen]

On 16/05/06, Dhawal Doshy <dhawal at netmagicsolutions.com> wrote:
> Drew Marshall wrote:
> >
> > On 4 May 2006, at 22:45, Glenn Steen wrote:
> >
> > <Snipped>
> >
> > Sadly I don't think I am the right guy either. Although I understand
> > what each of the nice bits of software do, how they play and the
> > mechanics, I am not a programmer nor do I understand the code bits of
> > either (Kind of like I can drive, I understand what a misfire is and can
> > even explain why but I'm not a mechanic!). I really think that Jules is
> > the man to explain how it all comes together (And understand the answers
> > better!) but perhaps there might be better results if between us we
> > could mediate between the two parties, if Jules doesn't fancy walking
> > back in to the lion's den and why indeed should he considering the past :-(
> >
> >>
> >> Anyway, my comments were the slight contrib I could do ATM. Sorry it's
> >> not more.
> >
> > Like wise
>
> Drew / Glenn / Other Postfix users,
>
> I almost gave up.. but somehow think that this matter needs to be
> clarified once and for all..

Yes... It would be very very good. Don't let us pessimists get you down:-)
>
> Are you guys game for getting together on the MailScanner IRC at some
> predefined time and drafting a mail (that is technically. grammatically
> and politically correct) to be sent to the postfix developers??

Unfortunately IRC from work is a no-no for me. So that rather limits
when I'm able to connect.
Add to that just too much to do (especially at home... Not to mention
the choir etc (yes, I sing in a church choir, a pretty good one at
that... We're just getting ready for a small tour:-)), and the
prospects of me participating is pretty low. Sorry.

But do suggest a time that would work for you. Who knows, we might get
lucky:-). And although Drew downplays his usefulness, I do believe he
should be in on it too.


-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se