Recommended SpamAssassin Rules (for RDJ)

[Peter Russell]

Just a note on James rules, they are very aggressive. They created a LOT 
of FPs for us. I suggest you watch your log carefully for a few days 
after you deploy them.


Martin Hepworth wrote:
> Jason
> 
> There's a thing in the wiki about this.....nut basically I run all the ones
> listed in rulesemporium.com and a few others from James Grey...
> 
> http://files.grayonline.id.au/
> 
> If you need the rulesdujour config for James's rules let me know off list..
> 
> --
> Martin Hepworth 
> Snr Systems Administrator
> Solid State Logic
> Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-
>> bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Jason Williams
>> Sent: 25 April 2006 16:39
>> To: MailScanner discussion
>> Subject: Recommended SpamAssassin Rules (for RDJ)
>>
>> Just curious here, what rules people liked to use with SpamAssassin. I
>> also use RDJ for SA.
>>
>> Right now, im using:
>>
>> 70_sare_evilnum0
>> 70_sare_random
>> 70_sare_stocks
>> 70_sare_unsub
>>
>> I know there are a lot more, but thought I'd ask here for a list of
>> recommendations, before I start downloading a bunch of rules.
>>
>> Just trying to make my Spam detection that much better.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
>> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> **********************************************************************
> 
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
> 
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
> for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.	
> 
> **********************************************************************
>