Recommended SpamAssassin Rules (for RDJ)

[James Gray]

On Mon, 1 May 2006 12:42 pm, Peter Russell wrote:
> Just a note on James rules, they are very aggressive. They created a LOT
> of FPs for us. I suggest you watch your log carefully for a few days
> after you deploy them.

Indeed they are.  That's why my site adds the following disclaimer:

The usual "no warranty given or implied" applies to all my rules. If they work 
for you, then that's just super :) If they jump up and eat your dog, cause 
your girlfriend to leave you, make you car explode or e-mail to disappear 
then don't blame me - it's up to you to test these rules for suitability to 
your own mail setup. Specifically my rules really punish anything that looks 
vaguely medical in content. Administrators working for medical institutions 
should audit these rules VERY carefully!

So yah - be careful.

Cheers,

James
-- 
"My life is a soap opera, but who has the rights?"
	-- MadameX
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20060501/158110a0/attachment.bin