Does spamassassin cache database lower the amount of spamassassin timeouts?

[Julian Field]

I haven't timed it before I installed the files, and they are  
production systems so I don't want to play with them. But they aren't  
very big rulesets compared to the header sets.


On 10 Mar 2006, at 09:51, Dave Strydom wrote:

> Julian,
>
> Doesn't your lint test time go through the roof when you add those  
> files?
>
> Currently my lint test takes 2.3sec to complete.
>
> Dave
>
> On 3/10/06, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>>
>> On 8 Mar 2006, at 18:41, Matt Kettler wrote:
>>
>>> If there's a particular kind of image-only spam involved, some of
>>> the SARE
>>> rulesets can be helpful. I personally like the following SARE
>>> rulesets and use
>>> them on my production systems:
>>>
>>>
>>> 70_sare_adult.cf
>>> 70_sare_evilnum0.cf
>>> 70_sare_genlsubj0.cf
>>> 70_sare_html0.cf
>>> 70_sare_obfu0.cf
>>> 70_sare_random.cf
>>> 70_sare_specific.cf
>>> 70_sare_stocks.cf
>>> 70_sare_uri0.cf
>>> 99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf
>>
>> Many thanks for posting that. I added obfu0 and stocks to my setups
>> and they have helped enormously! No spam whatsoever this morning.
>> :-)
>>

-- 
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.