Does spamassassin cache database lower the amount of
MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri Mar 10 10:06:06 GMT 2006
I haven't timed it before I installed the files, and they are
production systems so I don't want to play with them. But they aren't
very big rulesets compared to the header sets.
On 10 Mar 2006, at 09:51, Dave Strydom wrote:
> Doesn't your lint test time go through the roof when you add those
> Currently my lint test takes 2.3sec to complete.
> On 3/10/06, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> On 8 Mar 2006, at 18:41, Matt Kettler wrote:
>>> If there's a particular kind of image-only spam involved, some of
>>> the SARE
>>> rulesets can be helpful. I personally like the following SARE
>>> rulesets and use
>>> them on my production systems:
>> Many thanks for posting that. I added obfu0 and stocks to my setups
>> and they have helped enormously! No spam whatsoever this morning.
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner