Does spamassassin cache database lower the amount of spamassassin timeouts?

[Dave Strydom]

Julian,

Doesn't your lint test time go through the roof when you add those files?

Currently my lint test takes 2.3sec to complete.

Dave

On 3/10/06, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
> On 8 Mar 2006, at 18:41, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> > If there's a particular kind of image-only spam involved, some of
> > the SARE
> > rulesets can be helpful. I personally like the following SARE
> > rulesets and use
> > them on my production systems:
> >
> >
> > 70_sare_adult.cf
> > 70_sare_evilnum0.cf
> > 70_sare_genlsubj0.cf
> > 70_sare_html0.cf
> > 70_sare_obfu0.cf
> > 70_sare_random.cf
> > 70_sare_specific.cf
> > 70_sare_stocks.cf
> > 70_sare_uri0.cf
> > 99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf
>
> Many thanks for posting that. I added obfu0 and stocks to my setups
> and they have helped enormously! No spam whatsoever this morning.
> :-)
>
> - --
> Julian Field
> www.MailScanner.info
> Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
> PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.5 (Build 5050)
>
> iQEVAwUBRBFI9vw32o+k+q+hAQFWwwf/UEhaaYHiEKr7xEjrCRJDc+fZgyf5yNHq
> rRbp8EpVqF2DFBPXqB/gkzkeh8WQxnKjwJuuCNZhMs5z714VR7QOGYf5XTmGC7Fw
> ATjav0p9vxosJVzr/ROpzDiD4MWg/KR9/3KBKW/QYJWK4JfvZ6at93CWgLKNcvXr
> tVi2jMVuTQXrgO+Cw1Ip0A7jP5upho3UNbzyxRY/JJ7CCVhCPRrm0ThtmEoRuar2
> ukcln2Jc1SqTBG3SfDw5EWXqW6l8WKgn0g/yKc/jWaWK/l62GbBCQTjX/vdLwlyY
> s03TwfLY8HNOKmlqLmmULU6C0IBV3SC1CvOJDu8PcUn9VIAnDMjr4g==
> =v0WR
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>