Does spamassassin cache database lower the amount of spamassassin timeouts?

[Julian Field]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


On 8 Mar 2006, at 18:41, Matt Kettler wrote:

> If there's a particular kind of image-only spam involved, some of  
> the SARE
> rulesets can be helpful. I personally like the following SARE  
> rulesets and use
> them on my production systems:
>
>
> 70_sare_adult.cf
> 70_sare_evilnum0.cf
> 70_sare_genlsubj0.cf
> 70_sare_html0.cf
> 70_sare_obfu0.cf
> 70_sare_random.cf
> 70_sare_specific.cf
> 70_sare_stocks.cf
> 70_sare_uri0.cf
> 99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf

Many thanks for posting that. I added obfu0 and stocks to my setups  
and they have helped enormously! No spam whatsoever this morning.
:-)

- -- 
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.5 (Build 5050)

iQEVAwUBRBFI9vw32o+k+q+hAQFWwwf/UEhaaYHiEKr7xEjrCRJDc+fZgyf5yNHq
rRbp8EpVqF2DFBPXqB/gkzkeh8WQxnKjwJuuCNZhMs5z714VR7QOGYf5XTmGC7Fw
ATjav0p9vxosJVzr/ROpzDiD4MWg/KR9/3KBKW/QYJWK4JfvZ6at93CWgLKNcvXr
tVi2jMVuTQXrgO+Cw1Ip0A7jP5upho3UNbzyxRY/JJ7CCVhCPRrm0ThtmEoRuar2
ukcln2Jc1SqTBG3SfDw5EWXqW6l8WKgn0g/yKc/jWaWK/l62GbBCQTjX/vdLwlyY
s03TwfLY8HNOKmlqLmmULU6C0IBV3SC1CvOJDu8PcUn9VIAnDMjr4g==
=v0WR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.