Does spamassassin cache database lower the amount of
strydom.dave at gmail.com
Fri Mar 10 10:19:28 GMT 2006
Apparently not... I just got 2.03657
with the following loaded:
On 3/10/06, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> I haven't timed it before I installed the files, and they are
> production systems so I don't want to play with them. But they aren't
> very big rulesets compared to the header sets.
> On 10 Mar 2006, at 09:51, Dave Strydom wrote:
> > Julian,
> > Doesn't your lint test time go through the roof when you add those
> > files?
> > Currently my lint test takes 2.3sec to complete.
> > Dave
> > On 3/10/06, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> On 8 Mar 2006, at 18:41, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >>> If there's a particular kind of image-only spam involved, some of
> >>> the SARE
> >>> rulesets can be helpful. I personally like the following SARE
> >>> rulesets and use
> >>> them on my production systems:
> >>> 70_sare_adult.cf
> >>> 70_sare_evilnum0.cf
> >>> 70_sare_genlsubj0.cf
> >>> 70_sare_html0.cf
> >>> 70_sare_obfu0.cf
> >>> 70_sare_random.cf
> >>> 70_sare_specific.cf
> >>> 70_sare_stocks.cf
> >>> 70_sare_uri0.cf
> >>> 99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf
> >> Many thanks for posting that. I added obfu0 and stocks to my setups
> >> and they have helped enormously! No spam whatsoever this morning.
> >> :-)
> Julian Field
> Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
> PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner